DG, DMO, Ms Patience Oniha
By Our Reporter
A crisis of monumental proportion is currently rocking the Debt Management Office (DMO).
Reliable source revealed that DMO was recently entangled in a N1.08 billion fraud.
But in a swift reaction, the Director General of DMO, Patience Oniha denied the allegations of fraud in the office stating that the report was fabricated to tarnish the image of the office.
She added that the allegation was done by unnamed employees of DMO who were unhappy about being redeployed by the debt office.
The DG stated that the documents were twisted and distorted to misinform the public about the activities in DMO and the individuals behind the leaked document breached the Civil Service Rules but have also contravened laid down procedures for dealing with official matters.
“The DMO hereby states unequivocally that the story is false, full of lies and the documents referred to in the Vanguard’s report have been twisted and distorted with the intention to misinform the general public and discredit the institution. The Vanguard story is not a true representation of the dealings in the DMO.
“It should be noted that the DMO is an accountable, transparent and responsible organisation that works in accordance with laid down civil service procedures and it is highly regarded by Multilateral Agencies and financial institutions as a reputable Government Agency.
“The sponsors of the story are disgruntled elements who have not only breached the Civil Service Rules but have also contravened laid down procedures for dealing with official matters. These officials have resorted to illegally leaking official documents due to their recent redeployment, have colluded with other disgruntled persons who have failed in their attempts to control the running of the affairs of the DMO, which has blocked their ability to pilfer public funds.
“The story referred to documents that, on their own, are incomplete and do not reflect the whole story or the purpose of any transaction. The claims that events and travels by officials of the DMO either did not take place or did not hold are false and an attempt to discredit the impeccable records of the organization. These speak to their desperation to give the institution a bad name.
“The DMO, in line with laid down Civil Service Regulations, will brief relevant security agencies in the country to thoroughly investigate the sources of the documents, on which the sponsors based their story, with a view to bringing the perpetrators to book in line with Public Service Rules No. 030401 and 030402 which prescribes dismissal for unauthorized disclosure of official information as a serious act of misconduct’ She said with a note of finality